Automated vs Manual Migration
Initially, we weighed the pros and cons of automated and manual migration. The biggest advantage of automated migration is clear: it saves editors time and effort. However, a disadvantage is also evident. If content elements are not displayed as intended, this often becomes apparent only later in the migration process. "Dead" and broken links or non-search engine optimized content must be addressed and adjusted later – identifying and optimizing these can be time-consuming.
On the other hand, manual migration offers full control and typically results in a lower error rate. Editors can revise content during migration: by optimizing headlines, rewriting text according to SEO recommendations, or incorporating more suitable imagery. All of this is not a problem when migrating manually. However, this approach entails a significant time investment for the editors. Before content can be migrated step by step, everyone involved must first be trained with the new CMS.




)
)
)
)